<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More VMware Server in Production</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.briandowney.net/blog/2008/01/31/more-vmware-server-in-production/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.briandowney.net/blog/2008/01/31/more-vmware-server-in-production/</link>
	<description>Technical musings of an entrepreneur.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.briandowney.net/blog/2008/01/31/more-vmware-server-in-production/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 15:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briandowney.net/blog/2008/01/31/more-vmware-server-in-production/#comment-301</guid>
		<description>Ah, that's where I see the differences.   We put our VM's on a dedicated SAN, with a 1GB cached controller behind an NFS cluster.   Probably why were were seeing increased performance.

There's a also a decent amount of NFS tweaking required to get it working smoothly.  Once I had our network dialed-in, I was able to push 20Mb/s write in a VM, over NFS.

Check out some of the older articles on the site regarding the setup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, that&#8217;s where I see the differences.   We put our VM&#8217;s on a dedicated SAN, with a 1GB cached controller behind an NFS cluster.   Probably why were were seeing increased performance.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a also a decent amount of NFS tweaking required to get it working smoothly.  Once I had our network dialed-in, I was able to push 20Mb/s write in a VM, over NFS.</p>
<p>Check out some of the older articles on the site regarding the setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Ruset</title>
		<link>http://www.briandowney.net/blog/2008/01/31/more-vmware-server-in-production/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Ruset</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 14:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briandowney.net/blog/2008/01/31/more-vmware-server-in-production/#comment-300</guid>
		<description>We had originally attempted to put our vmdk's on a PowerEdge 2900 with 8x500gb SATA drives and a PERC controller, shared out with NFS. We've been seeing speeds slower than software raid out of that PERC controller, which meant that once we had ~20 or so VM's sitting on NFS, the guest OS's would start seeing SCSI timeouts as the 2900 struggled to get I/O processed fast enough.

So we're slapping 750gb drives in each server and going back to local disk, for now. We're also buying 10 more PE1950's, bringing us up to a 25 server VMWare Server farm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had originally attempted to put our vmdk&#8217;s on a PowerEdge 2900 with 8&#215;500gb SATA drives and a PERC controller, shared out with NFS. We&#8217;ve been seeing speeds slower than software raid out of that PERC controller, which meant that once we had ~20 or so VM&#8217;s sitting on NFS, the guest OS&#8217;s would start seeing SCSI timeouts as the 2900 struggled to get I/O processed fast enough.</p>
<p>So we&#8217;re slapping 750gb drives in each server and going back to local disk, for now. We&#8217;re also buying 10 more PE1950&#8217;s, bringing us up to a 25 server VMWare Server farm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
